Business valuation disputes in divorce often turn into what lawyers refer to as a battle of the experts. Each spouse hires a business valuation expert, each expert prepares detailed reports, and each expert reaches a different conclusion about the value of the business.

From the client’s perspective, this can feel like a competition that must be “won.” In reality, there is often no true winner.

Business valuations are not exact science. They rely on assumptions, methodologies, projections, and judgment calls. Two qualified experts can review the same business and arrive at significantly different numbers—both of which may be technically defensible.

As the dispute escalates, costs increase, positions harden, and the business itself can suffer.

What Happens When Valuation Disputes Go to Court

When valuation disputes are litigated, the process becomes expensive, public, time-consuming, and unpredictable.

Court filings, expert reports, testimony, and financial exhibits often become part of the public record. Sensitive information about revenue, profit margins, compensation, clients, and internal operations may be disclosed in ways that cannot be undone.

In addition, judges simply do not have unlimited time to absorb the depth of financial data presented in business valuation cases. A trial judge may be managing dozens of cases simultaneously and may have only limited time to review thousands of pages of financial exhibits and expert testimony.

At the end of the process, the judge must choose between competing expert opinions—often without the ability to fully explore every nuance of the business.

Why Mediation Often Works Better for Business Valuation Disputes

Mediation offers a fundamentally different—and often more effective—approach.

In mediation, the process is private, the parties control the outcome, experts can be questioned and challenged in depth, creative settlement structures are possible, and the focus is on resolution rather than “winning.”

A skilled mediator has the time to dig into the details, ask questions, test assumptions, and help both sides understand the strengths and weaknesses of their valuation positions. This often leads to more realistic outcomes and avoids the all-or-nothing risk of trial.

Importantly, mediation allows business owners to protect confidentiality while reaching a resolution that preserves the value of the business and minimizes disruption.

There Is Rarely a Perfect Answer—Only a Better Process

In most business valuation disputes, the question is not “Who is right?” but rather “How do we reach a fair resolution without destroying the business or spending more than the dispute is worth?”

Litigation may be necessary in some cases, but for many business owners, mediation provides greater privacy, more thoughtful analysis, lower cost, reduced risk, and better long-term outcomes.

Choosing the right process can be just as important as choosing the right valuation expert.

Talk to an Experienced Arizona Divorce Attorney

If your divorce involves a business valuation dispute, early guidance matters. How valuation issues are handled can have long-term financial consequences.

Call Best Law Firm
Scottsdale, Arizona
BestLawAZ.com

About the Authors

Cynthia L. Best, Esq.
Founder, Best Law Firm
38 Years of Legal Experience • Certified Mediator
Co-Author of The Divorce Coach

Tali Best Collins, Esq.
Managing Attorney, Best Law Firm
Over 18 Years of Legal Experience • Certified Mediator
Co-Author of The Divorce Coach