APPENDIX E: END NOTES

APPENDIX E: END NOTES

  1. A.R.S. §25-312 outlines the Arizona requirements for divorce.
  2. Domicile means a party’s residence, but a temporary absence necessitated by business, occupation, or military service does not defeat residence. (36 A.L.R.2d at 763 (1954).) Page 105 in Practice Guide.
  3. From an article titled “After the Split” in the August 16, 1998 edition of The Kansas City Star MoneyWise section, written by staffer Gene Meyer, quoted by Diane Sollee on the Coalition for Marriage, Family and Couples Education,LLC (CMFCE) listserv
  4. Moore, Marsha K., “Interest of the Child,” http://www.familyfriendpoems.com/family/poetry.asp?poem=1402, 2006.
  5. Best Interest Of The Child, Divorce Poems http://www.familyfriendpoems.com/family/poetry.asp?poem=1402#ixzz0uucg91jg
  6. http://www.azcadv.org/domestic-violence-info/domestic-violence-fa/definitions-of-domes/top.
  7. (US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Fact Sheet, April 2000)
  8. (Bureau of Justice Statistics Report. Intimate Partner Violence, United States Department of Justice, May 2000. NCJ 178247)
  9. (Sandra Graham-Bermann & Julie Seng, Violence Exposure and Traumatic Stress Symptoms as Additional Predictors

of Health Problems in High-Risk Children, 146 J. of Pediatrics 309 (2005).

  1. Sharmila Lawrence, National Center for Children in Poverty, Domestic Violence and Welfare Policy: Research Findings That Can Inform Policies on Marriage and Child Well-Being 5 (2002).
  2. (American Bar Association, Judicial Subcommittee of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Domestic Violence, Judicial Checklist)
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Domestic Violence Fact

Sheet, 1998)

  1. (“Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project: A Human Rights Approach to Child Decision-making and Domestic Violence,” Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence, June 2003.)
  2. (Bergen, Issues in Intimate Violence, Sage Publications, 1998)
  3. (Johnson, MP (2005) Apples and oranges in child decision-making disputes: Intimate terrorism vs. situational couple violence. Journal of Child Decision-making. 2(4) 43-52.)
  4. (Kernic, M.A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D.J., Koespell, J.K., & Holt, V.L. 92005). Children in the crossfire: Child decision-making

determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence against Women, 11, 991-1021) et al. 2005)

  1. (Saunders, D. (2007, October). Child decision-making and visitation decisions in domestic violence cases: Legal trends, risk

factors, and safety concerns. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved 05/26/2009, from: http://www.vawnet.org) xviii (Bergen, Issues in Intimate Violence, Sage Publications, 1998)

  1. (Zorza, Joan. “Batterer Manipulation and Retaliation: Denial & Complicity in the Family Courts.” 4 Feminista, (2001) <www.feminista.com/v4n7/zorza.html> (4/24/03)
  2. (Brown, Molly A. Child Decision-making in Cases Involving Domestic Violence: Is it really in the “Best Interest” of

Children to Have unrestricted Contact With Their Mother’s Abusers? Journal of the Missouri Bar, November- December 2001)

  1. (Jaffe, Peter, Ph.D. “Impact of Domestic Violence on Children and Families in Divorce.” Expose: The Failure of

Family Courts to Protect Children From Abuse in Decision-making Disputes – A Resource Book for Lawmakers, Judges, Attorneys, and Mental Health Professionals, los Gatos: Our Children Our Future Charitable Foundation, 1999, 135.) xxii http://www.azcadv.org/domestic-violence-info/domestic-violence-fa/facts-and- statistics/domesticviolenceanddecision-making/top .(“Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project: A Human Rights Approach to Child Decision-making and Domestic Violence,” Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence, June 2003.

xxiii http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/FamilyCourt/Services/ConciliationServices/DC LOGO